Do you think we develop that kinky side

To make up for the singular lack of pleasure

Found in a lazy lover of meagre proportions?

If a well endowed man is a passionate, giving lover

Does our body crave and need his thick cock

And are we content to be serviced by that alone?

When hung like a stallion, we are happy to be mare

Being taken and used for the purpose of breeding

In the spirit of all wild and willing animals

If there is nothing between us but hardened flesh

And the sweet giving softness men want to feel

When masticating on bountiful female fruit,

Is the mass of his staff the only kink needed

When it parts a woman so cleanly in perfection

You’re sinfully content to be a willing size queen

This entry was posted in cock size, cuckold, Sex and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to de-kinked

  1. ismeisreallyme says:

    I never thought I was a size queen as DH is well endowed but lacks the desire or willingness to learn how to be a generous or thoughtful lover and utilize all of his assets. However, he, is of average length and size and yet he is such a generous, inventive and thoughtful lover he has me sated and purring with pleasure in those moments together. Which has made me a size queen as in “it’s not about the size of a cock. but how a man fills me, literally and figuratively, with all of himself unguarded”

  2. kdaddy23 says:

    I think we develop that kinky side not because of a singular lack of pleasure but because we eventually realize that there is more to pleasure than we were led to believe and like anything that’s good for and to ya, we want more because there’s no such thing as too much sexual pleasure in the minds of those of us who are kinkier than what’s considered to be normal.

    What pushes the kiny side more is the knowledge that bigger isn’t always better and now it’s about finding that which is bigger and will be better and then discovering the many ways it can be better… because if it’s not going to be bigger, better, and diverse, it doesn’t suit our pursuit of blissful pleasure.

    One can become… de-kinked when size means more than the ability of its owner to use it; in the absence of size, does skill and desire still having meaning… or does it allow us to pursue other kinky avenues?

    • rougedmount says:

      ….in the absence of size, BOTH skill and desire has meaning as it allow us to pursue kinky alternatives to sexual fulfillment. It’s far easier to love, adore and crave vanilla sex, if your partner is well endowed AND knows how to sexually handle himself.

      • kdaddy23 says:

        And that can be a big “if,” can’t it? Some of us have learned that size alone isn’t enough to get the kink flowing for us; it takes skill, desire, and imagination and the will to take things beyond just plain vanilla…

        Just my two cents (or more) worth…

      • forlumbus says:

        Explain the woman who loved having vanilla sex with a smaller endowed partner, and rough kinky sex with a very large endowed partner, both of whom she was seeing at the same time.

      • rougedmount says:

        because her sex life is awesome …the end

  3. Village Idiot says:

    Dear rougedmount:

    I really don’t know how to reply to this one. On physical dimension, I have no idea what difference this makes for a woman because I’m not a woman. How should I know? Of course, I scarcely know what it feels for a man to be in a woman either. But that is entirely my own fault for being so anally ‘faithful’ [as if celibacy fulfilled our marital obligation :(]

    But that’s not my point.

    What I don’t get is that a man would be a lazy lover. FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY — LOOK AT WHERE YOU ARE, MAN! Any living male who can’t get passionate about that should consider getting a frontal lobotomy from the local roto-rooter guy.

    Iillage Vidi … er … Village Idiot

    • rougedmount says: you know, i do find solace that others also find a man who is a lazy lover as an anomaly of nature. i can not even state it’s a sexist belief on my part, that a man should be ‘ever ready’… as i am not one and that is beyond my creative limits… but isn’t man by his very nature of being a ‘man’ …ready and willing to engage in sexual congress as the foundations of opportunistic conquest are built into the very fiber of his DNA? the truth is: some men are lazy/uninterested/unwilling…some are castrated/medicated/afflicted…all results are the same; Lazy lovers and angry partners

Share your thoughts...I did

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s